How 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' ends and what it means for 'Star Wars'

Spoiler alert! We're talking about the ending of"The Mandalorian and Grogu" (in theaters now), so turn away if you haven't seen the movie yetand don't want to know anything.

USA TODAY

They grow up so fast.

That's one of the takeaways from "The Mandalorian and Grogu," in which the title kid steps up to the plate more than ever before. Grogu may not speak his first words just yet, but he proves so capable in a stretch near the end of the movie, it hints that he could one day lead a "Star Wars" film all on his own, withouthis dadin the picture.

As a whole, "The Mandalorian and Grogu" is mostly a standalone adventure that doesn't change a lot about the "Star Wars" galaxy. Still, there are a few things worth discussing about how it ends, what it means, and what's next. Let's break it down.

Join our Watch Party!Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox

How does 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' end?

You didn'treallythink they'd kill off the Mandalorian (Pedro Pascal), did you?

Well, it did look dicey there for a minute. Mando has a brush with death after unwisely angering the Hutts, who task him with hunting down Jabba's son, Rotta (Jeremy Allen White). When Mando fails to deliver them Rotta, the Hutts try to have him killed, and he winds up getting bitten by a giant snake.

A poisoned Mando loses consciousness and seems toast until Grogu manages to build his dad shelter, track down medicine, and nurse him back to health. After he comes to, Mando turns the tables on the Hutt twins, who are eaten by that same snake.

The Mandalorian (Pedro Pascal) has a brush with death, but is saved by his son Grogu in

With the Hutts dealt with, Mando checks in with Colonel Ward (Sigourney Weaver), and Rotta expresses interest in joining the New Republic. The movie ends with Mando and Grogu in their new Razor Crest. After warning the kid not to press the buttons on the ship earlier, in the last scene, Mando tells Grogu to go ahead and press them as the pair jump to hyperspace. "Your turn," he says, symbolizing how Grogu is becoming not just Mando's son, but also his copilot.

Is there a 'Mandalorian and Grogu' post-credits scene?

Nope! There's nothing after the credits − which isn't a surprise, given that no "Star Wars" movie has ever had a credits scene.

What does 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' ending set up?

In broad strokes, the movie doesn't move much forward for the overall "Mandalorian" storyline. Mando is still a New Republic contractor, and the Imperials are still a threat, though down a few baddies.

Advertisement

One event that may have a lasting impact, though, is Mando's helmet being removed again. In Season 3 of the TV series, Mando showing his face led to an arc where he had to redeem himself on Mandalore. It would be quite repetitive to have him do all that again, but the film seems to introduce a new loophole: Mando can get away with showing his face as long as he leaves no witnesses. This could allow Pascal to appear on screen more often going forward, without Mando needing to be redeemed all over again each time.

Additionally, Mando's relationship with the New Republic is strengthened, and while he's technically still a contractor, Ward makes clear she now considers him part of her team. Rotta joining the New Republic also sets him up to return.

But the biggest takeaway may be how much more self-reliant Grogu seems by the end of the movie. Since Season 1, Grogu has always been a sidekick for Mando to keep safe. But this time, the kid takes center stage for a surprisingly long time while Mando isn't even conscious, and he gets quite a bit accomplished without his dad's help.

As the film emphasizes, Grogu's species ages so slowly that he'll live for hundreds of years. So as "Star Wars" begins moving ahead into the period after "The Rise of Skywalker" and beyond, it seems inevitable Grogu as a character will stick around for a long time, while his dad, being just a mortal man, won't. "The Mandalorian and Grogu" could be setting the stage for that day when Grogu, sans Mando, graduates into a full-blown protagonist.

Will there be a 'Mandalorian and Grogu' sequel?

While their story obviously isn't done, it isn't clear in what form we'll see Mando and Grogu again. The next steps probably depend on how big of a hit the movie is. If it overperforms, another big-screen outing may follow.

But director Jon Favreau has said he wrote scripts for "The Mandalorian" Season 4 before the plan was changed to make a movie, and he started from scratch for the film's screenplay. So if the movie only performs OK, the characters could head back to Disney+. And because the movie ends in a similar place to where it started, those Season 4 scripts are presumably still usable.

Where is the 'Mandalorian' story heading?

The broader story of "The Mandalorian" is clearly building to a showdown with the Imperial holdouts. This will likely be continued in 2027 with Season 2 of "Ahsoka," after the first season involved Grand Admiral Thrawn returning from exile to lead the Imperials.

And in 2023,Lucasfilm announced a "Star Wars" moviethat will "close out the interconnected stories told in 'The Mandalorian,' 'The Book of Boba Fett,' 'Ahsoka' and other Disney+ series." The plot hasn't been revealed, but it seems like a safe bet this will feature a climactic battle against Thrawn, who was also mentioned as a looming threat in "The Mandalorian" Season 3.

What 'Star Wars' movies are coming out next?

In addition to that "Mandalorian" finale movie, a few other "Star Wars" films are on the way, including "Star Wars: Starfighter," which takes place five years after "The Rise of Skywalker" andstars Ryan Gosling.

Lucasfilm has also announced a movie about Rey building a new Jedi Order after "The Rise of Skywalker," as well as a film about the dawn of the Jedi. And in 2024, it was revealed thatSimon Kinberg is writing a new trilogy, though the plot is unknown.

But Lucasfilm is infamous for announcing "Star Wars" projects that never come to fruition, so the only movie we know for sure will be released is "Starfighter." That film has already been shot, and it opens on May 28, 2027.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:'The Mandalorian and Grogu' ending and where 'Star Wars' goes now

How 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' ends and what it means for 'Star Wars'

Spoiler alert! We're talking about the ending of"The Mandalorian and Grogu" (in theaters now), so turn away if you haven...
When is the 2026 World Cup roster deadline?

With the World Cup commencing on June 11, national teams from across the globe have either announced or are putting the finishing touches to their squad for the tournament.

USA TODAY

After the qualified nations provided FIFA a preliminary list featuring between 35 and 55 players, the associations will then reduce the squad size to no less than 23 and no more than 26 members (three of them must be goalkeepers).

National teams are allowed to announce their squads at any time, with the likes of France, England and many morereleasing their lists in recent days.

The deadline to submit final rosters to FIFA isJune 1.

Advertisement

On June 2, FIFA plans to announce the 26-player official squad lists for the 48 qualified nations.

Teams will have the ability to replace a player in the final roster with a player from provisional squad in the event of a serious injury or illness, no later than 24 hours before their team’s first match at the World Cup.

A goalkeeper in the final squad may be replaced by another goalkeeper from the provisional squad in the event of a serious injury or illness at any time during the tournament.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:2026 World Cup roster deadline: When do teams have to submit squads?

When is the 2026 World Cup roster deadline?

With the World Cup commencing on June 11, national teams from across the globe have either announced or are putting the finishing touch...
Reports: LIV pitching 10-event, international schedule to investors

LIV Golf is pitching a reduced 10-event international schedule to potential investors, Sportico and CNBC reported.

Field Level Media

The league reportedly is seeking $250 million to $350 million in funding to continue operations beyond this year after Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund announced its financial commitment will end at the conclusion of the season.

According to the reports, LIV Golf's investment pitch outlines a plan built around international tournaments and uses the high attendance figures in Australia and South Africa as benchmarks.

The 2026 LIV Golf calendar originally featured 14 events, including five in the United States. A tournament scheduled for New Orleans from June 25-28 has been postponed.

Bloomberg reported earlier this week that LIV Golf is preparing for a potential bankruptcy filing.

Advertisement

An LIV Golf spokesperson responded to that report with a lengthy statement to Golf Digest.

"LIV Golf is firmly focused on securing a transaction that positions the organization for the long-term," read the statement. "As we begin presenting our go-forward business plan to prospective capital partners, we are focused on achieving a sustainable future and there are multiple pathways under active exploration.

"We continue to see great momentum on the course and with support through the 2026 season and a clear plan to raise capital, leadership is focused on identifying the right long-term strategic partners who believe in our mission to grow the game of golf worldwide. These conversations are just getting underway, and as they progress, the company expects to gain further clarity around the structure and timing of a potential transaction."

In addition to the loss of PIF funding, LIV Golf soon may be facing a talent vacuum. Golf Digest reported that agents for several players have reached out to the PGA Tour about potential pathways back for their clients.

--Field Level Media

Reports: LIV pitching 10-event, international schedule to investors

LIV Golf is pitching a reduced 10-event international schedule to potential investors, Sportico and CNBC reported. The league rep...
Draymond Green defends James Harden by calling out Cavs teammates — why he's not wrong

Draymond Green didn't just come to the defense of James Harden after the Cleveland Cavaliers' Game 1 collapse against theNew York Knicks; he had a stern message for the star guard's teammates. Speaking onThe Draymond Green Show, Green made the case that Cleveland's defensive breakdowns,not Harden's limitations, opened the door for Jalen Brunson to take over late in a 115-104 overtime loss. That same trend continued into Cleveland's 103-93 Game 2 loss, and when you look at how the Knicks attacked each game, it's hard to argue with the Golden State Warriors forward.

USA TODAY

"Jalen Brunson living on an island with James Harden guarding him. This isn't just a coaching issue," Harden said. "When you're trying to compete at a championship level, you must have guys that want to take on that challenge [and say] 'I'm not switching at this point in the game'..."

"… But you got guys in there that don't really want that challenge, they don't wanna fight through the screen and say 'this my matchup, I wanna stop this guy,'" Harden continued. "… It is not James Harden's job to guard Jalen Brunson 1-on-1, it's not what he's paid to do, some of those other guys who's just switching off, it is your f***ing job."

Green's argument wasn't just a passionate pushback on the current narrative surrounding the Eastern Conference Finals matchup; it's also extremely valid.

Advertisement

Criticism of James Harden's defense vs. the Knicks shouldn't fall on the Cavaliers star

Arguably, the most important line from Green was the point that shutting down Brunson is "not what [Harden's] paid to do." When theCavaliers struck a deal to acquire Hardenin exchange for Darius Garland, the mindset had to be focused on adding more offensive firepower. You aren't making that trade to bolster your defense or call on Harden to defend an opposing team's best player.

The Cavaliers have several above-average defensive players, but regardless, Green is correct about not allowing Harden to get switched onto Brunson immediately consistently each game. This situation isn't the same as longtime NBA fans have seen in the past, when players like Kobe Bryant or LeBron James would take on that matchup.

Comparing the situation with Harden to one with Bryant and/or James is unrealistic, as the two are polar opposites. Bryant was one of the most intense players to ever play in the NBA, and James is a physical specimen who could guard any position on the floor, especially during his prime years.

However, Harden is an exceptional offensive weapon with elite passing ability who can score from anywhere on the floor. The Cavaliers should be actively game-planning around how to approach the rest of this series defensively, with a detailed emphasis on not asking one of their two top offensive weapons to chase one of the league's best guards, Brunson, around all night.

This article originally appeared on For The Win:James Harden criticism sparks fiery Draymond Green response — why he's not wrong

Draymond Green defends James Harden by calling out Cavs teammates — why he's not wrong

Draymond Green didn't just come to the defense of James Harden after the Cleveland Cavaliers' Game 1 collapse against theNew Yo...
Donald Trump skewers 'total jerk' Stephen Colbert after “The Late Show ”finale: 'Thank goodness he’s finally gone!'

Donald Trump is happy The Late Show With Stephen Colbert is over.

Entertainment Weekly Donald Trump in the Oval Office in 2025; Stephen Colbert on 'The Late Show' in FebruraryCredit: Anna Moneymaker/Getty; Scott Kowalchyk/CBS

Key Points

  • The president celebrated the show coming to a close and attacked its host on social media.

  • Trump called Colbert a "total jerk," adding, "Thank goodness he’s finally gone!"

Donald Trumpis gloating overStephen Colbertlosing his job less than 24 hours afterThe Late Showaired its final episode.

The president attacked the late-night host ina Truth Social postearly Friday morning, calling him a “total jerk” and comparing his onstage presence to that of a dead man.

“Colbert is finally finished at CBS. Amazing that he lasted so long!” Trump wrote. “No talent, no ratings, no life. He was like a dead person. You could take any person off of the street and they would be better than this total jerk.”

Donald Trump's Truth Social postCredit: Donald Trump/Truth Social

“Thank goodness he’s finally gone!” he continued.

Trump previously warned reporters thathe would send “a message” to Colbert afterThe Late Showconcluded its historic 33-year run on Thursday.

Colbert, meanwhile, celebrated his last episode ofThe Late Showwith an uplifting sendoff that madeno mention of Trump at all. Instead, the finale saw Colbert visited by his fellow late-night hosts John Oliver, Seth Meyers, Jimmy Fallon, and Jimmy Kimmel , a.k.a. "Strike Force Five." There were cameos by Bryan Cranston, Paul Rudd, Tim Meadows, and Ryan Reynolds. And, finally, the former Beatle himselfPaul McCartneysat down foran interview with the host and performed "Hello, Goodbye"with the house band, Colbert, and Elvis Costello, as audience and crew members danced on stage.

CBS announced last summer thatThe Late Showwould come to an end in May, calling the move “purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.” Reports have suggested the network was losing upwards of $40 million a year on the production.

Advertisement

However, others have speculated that Paramount’s merger with Skydance Media, which required approval from Trump's Federal Communications Commission at the time, may have been a potential cause for the show’s shuttering. Especially since Colbert had been critical of the merger on his show prior to its cancellation.

Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with ourEW Dispatch newsletter.

Trump previously denied any involvement inThe Late Show's demise.

“Everybody is saying that I was solely responsible for the firing of Stephen Colbert from CBS, Late Night. That is not true!”he wrote on Truth Social. “The reason he was fired was a pure lack of TALENT, and the fact that this deficiency was costing CBS $50 Million Dollars a year in losses — And it was only going to get WORSE!”

Stephen Colbert during Thursday night's finale of 'The Late Show'Credit: Scott Kowalchyk/CBS

FormerLate ShowhostDavid Lettermanrecently claimed that top brass at Paramount Global and Skydance Media"dumped” Colbert so that he couldn't make any more “trouble” for CBS.

“I’m just going to go on record as saying: They're lying," Letterman toldThe New York Times. "Let me just add one other thing... They're lying weasels."

Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

Donald Trump skewers 'total jerk' Stephen Colbert after “The Late Show ”finale: 'Thank goodness he’s finally gone!'

Donald Trump is happy The Late Show With Stephen Colbert is over. Key Points The president celebrated the show co...

 

ANIO AMAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com